Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society Volume 7 Page 57

Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society Volume 7 Page 57 is in Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society Volume 7.

Earthworks in the Neighbourhood of Burton. By the Rev. F. Warre.

Of Cadbury Castle [Map], the second remarkable earthwork to which I wish at present to draw your attention, Camden gives the following account. The River Ivell rises in Dorsetshire, and receives a little river, upon which is Camalet, a steep mountain of very difficult ascent, on the top of which are the plain footsteps of a decayed camp, and a triple rampart of earth cast up, including 20 acres (the ground plan says 60 acres and 32 perches). The inhabitants call it Arthur’s Palace, but that it was really a work of the Romans is plain, from Roman coins daily dug up there. What they might call it I am altogether ignorant, unless it be that Caer Calemion, in Nennius’s catalogue, by a trans position of letters from Camelion. Cadbury, the adjoin ing little village, may, by a conjecture probable enough, be thought, that Cathbregion, where Arthur, as Nennius hath it, routed the Saxons in a memorable engagement.” And in the additions to Camden published with Gibson’s edition, I find the following description : “ Leaving the sea coast, our next direction is the river Ivell, near which is Camalet, mentioned by Mr. Camden, as a place of great antiquity. The hill is a mile in compass ; at the top four trenches circling it, and between each of them an earthen wall. On the very top of the hill, is an area of 20 acres or more, where, in several places, as Leland observes, may be seen the foundations of walls, and there was much dusky age ; blue stone which the people of the adjoining villages had in his time carried away besides coins ; Stowe, tells us of a silver horse shoe there digged up in the memory of that and Leland describes it in a kind of ecstasy, “ Grood Lord says he, what deep ditches, what high walls, what precipices are here ; in short, I look upon it as a very great wonder both of art and nature.” How far it may be con sidered a wonder of nature, I cannot say ; but that it is a wonder of primeval art, I think no one who sees it will deny. The high walls and foundations of wall as well as all traces of the internal arrangement of this great military station, have totally disappeared, but the outer fortifications of the hill are in a tolerable state of preservation. What outworks there may have been, cannot now be ascertained, as, with the exception of the traces of some platforms pro bably stations for slingers on the south-side, everything outside the main fortification has been obliterated by mo dern agriculture ; but there are the vast trenches with their earthen walls, on some of which, I thought I could trace the remains of a low breastwork of dry masonry. There are at present three entrances, easily to be made out ; the first, on the East side, is that now used as an approach to the field occupying the area within the fortification, and has been so enlarged and made easy of access, for the con venience of the tenant, as to have entirely lost its ancient character, so much as to render it almost doubtful whether it be original or not ; but, on the whole, I think it probable that there was an entrance at this point. The next is at tlic South East angle of the place, and, having crossed the outer defences, opens into the moat, between the inner agger and the one next to it; the path over the inner agger being steep and narrow, and probably strongly fortified. This opening of the road into the moat, is a feature very commonly to be observed in British fortifications, and seems to have been intended to lead an attacking force to points where they might be overwhelmed from above, and forced down the steep side of the hill by a charge of the troops who occupied the higher ground. This seems to have been the case in this instance, as in many places the top of the second agger is not raised above the level of the moat, through which the road led. At the South West angle is the main entrance, which leads through all the entrenchments, up to the area of the place. There are here evident vestiges of flanking works ; and I think the whole descent was commanded by platforms for slingers. There also appears to have been a smaller opening on the North side, leading through the entrenchments to the spring which supplied the place with water, and is situ ated low down among the fortifications of that side ; but the entrenchment on the North has been so tampered with by modern fences, that I cannot speak positively about it. At the highest point of the ground within the fortifications, there are still vestiges of what may have been the foundations of an interior fortification.

It certainly seems extraordinary that the learned Cam den should have mistaken such a work as I have described for one of Roman construction, and still more so that he should have been led to this conclusion by so fallacious a guide as the presence of Roman coins, which would cer tainly be no proof that it was not of Romano-British construction, Roman money having been in circulation in these Islands long after the departure of tlie Romans themselves, and still less, that it was not a Belgic or aboriginal British work, afterwards occupied by the Ro mans and Romano-British, which we may almost positive ly assert is the fact. Whether it be Belgic, or originally British, may be more difficult to determine ; and the total obliteration of all wwks within the ramparts, increases the difficulty very much ; but, on the whole, from the general plan and construction of the fortifications, being a series of concentric ramparts, without any independent outworks, with the exception of the platforms I have before men tioned, as well as from the absence of all trace of the three-fold arrangement which I have elsewhere spoken of, as analogous to the outer and inner bailies and keep of a mediaeval castle, and which I am inclined to believe is the characteristic type of the original British fortified towns in this part of England, I am inclined to believe it to be a very strong military post of the Belgse, probably intended as a sort of head quarters for their armies in this part of their territories ; and to this opinion I am the more in clined from the marked difference observable between the plan of this fortification, and those to which I have alluded as occupying the strong ground from sea to sea on the West of the Parret, and being probably the line of frontier strongholds established by the aborigines, as a defence against the Belgic invaders. The name, too, of the place, Cath Byrig, which I believe means the military town, or the town of the battle, would seem, in some degree, to strengthen this opinion.